Amisulpride Decreases Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation in the Brain of OXYS Rats.

AIM: In this study, OXYS rats of three ages (1, 3, and 6 months), a proven model of Alzheimer's disease (AD), at various stages of disease progression were used to thoroughly study the effects of amisulpride on behavior and tau protein phosphorylation. BACKGROUND: With the growing number of patients with AD, the problem of finding a cure is very acute. Neurodegeneration in AD has various causes, one of which is hyperphosphorylation of tau protein. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether amisulpride would affect pathological tau phosphorylation in AD. METHODS: We assessed the influence of chronic administration of amisulpride (3 weeks, 3 mg/kg per day, intraperitoneally)-a 5-HT7 receptor inverse agonist-on behavior and tau hyperphosphorylation in OXYS rats (at ages of 1, 3, and 6 months). RESULTS: Chronic administration of amisulpride dramatically decreased tau phosphorylation in the frontal cortex and hippocampus of 3-month-old OXYS rats. Additionally, in 1- and 3-month-old rats' hippocampi, amisulpride diminished the mRNA level of the Cdk5 gene encoding one of the main tau kinases involved in the 5-HT7 receptor-induced effect on tau phosphorylation. CONCLUSION: Thus, We found that chronic administration of amisulpride could reduce pathological tau hyperphosphorylation while reducing anxiety. We propose amisulpride to have therapeutic potential against AD and that it can be the most effective in the early stages of the disease.

Early non-response as a predictor of later non-response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: It remains a challenge to predict the long-term response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia who do not respond at an early stage. This study aimed to investigate the optimal predictive cut-off value for early non-response that would better predict later non-response to antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: This multicenter, 8-week, open-label, randomized trial was conducted at 19 psychiatric centers throughout China. All enrolled participants were assigned to olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, or aripiprazole monotherapy for 8 weeks. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) was evaluated at baseline, week 2, week 4, and week 8. The main outcome was the prediction of nonresponse. Nonresponse is defined as a < 20% reduction in the total scores of PANSS from baseline to endpoint. Severity ratings of mild, moderate, and severe illness corresponded to baseline PANSS total scores of 58, 75, and 95, respectively. RESULTS: At week 2, a reduction of < 5% in the PANSS total score showed the highest total accuracy in the severe and mild schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 75.0% and 80.8%, respectively), and patients who were treated with the risperidone and amisulpride groups (total accuracy, 82.4%, and 78.2%, respectively). A 10% decrease exhibited the best overall accuracy in the moderate schizophrenia patients (total accuracy, 84.0%), olanzapine (total accuracy, 79.2%), and aripiprazole group (total accuracy, 77.4%). At week 4, the best predictive cut-off value was < 20%, regardless of the antipsychotic or severity of illness (total accuracy ranging from 89.8 to 92.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom reduction at week 2 has acceptable discrimination in predicting later non-response to antipsychotics in schizophrenia, and a more accurate predictive cut-off value should be determined according to the medication regimen and baseline illness severity. The response to treatment during the next 2 weeks after week 2 could be further assessed to determine whether there is a need to change antipsychotic medication during the first four weeks. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03451734).

Does drug use affect the efficacy of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders? Results from a pragmatic, randomised study.

OBJECTIVES: Drug use is prevalent in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) but there is limited knowledge about the influence of drug use on the effectiveness of antipsychotic medication. This secondary explorative study compared the effectiveness of three antipsychotics in patients with SSD, with and without drug use. METHODS: The BeSt InTro multi-centre, head to head, rater-blinded randomised study compared amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine over a 1-year follow-up period. All patients (n = 144) were aged ≥18 years and met the ICD-10 criteria for SSD (F20-29). Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The primary outcome was reduction of a PANSS positive subscale score. RESULTS: At baseline, 38% of all patients reported drug use in the last 6 months before inclusion, with cannabis as the main drug (85%), followed by amphetamine-type stimulants (45%), sedatives (26%), hallucinogens (19%), cocaine (13%), opiates (4%), GHB (4%), solvents (4%), analgesics (4%) and anabolic steroids (2%). The predominant pattern was the use of several drugs. There were no significant overall differences in the PANSS positive subscale score reduction for the three studied antipsychotics among patients either with or without drug use. In the drug use group, older patients treated with amisulpride showed a greater PANSS positive subscale score reduction during the treatment period compared to younger patients. CONCLUSION: The current study showed that drug use does not appear to affect the overall effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine in patients with SSD. However, amisulpride may be a particularly suitable choice for older patients with drug use.

Clinical insight among persons with schizophrenia spectrum disorders treated with amisulpride, aripiprazole or olanzapine: a semi-randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic treatment may improve clinical insight. However, previous studies have reported inconclusive findings on whether antipsychotics improve insight over and above the reduction in symptoms of psychosis. These studies assessed homogeneous samples in terms of stage of illness. Randomised studies investigating a mixed population of first- and multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders might clarify this disagreement. METHODS: Our data were derived from a pragmatic, rater-blinded, semi-randomised trial that compared the effectiveness of amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine. A sample of 144 patients with first- or multiepisode schizophrenia spectrum disorders underwent eight assessments during a 1-year follow-up. Clinical insight was assessed by item General 12 from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). We analysed latent growth curve models to test if the medications had a direct effect on insight that was over and above the reduction in total psychosis symptoms. Furthermore, we investigated whether there were differences between the study drugs in terms of insight. RESULTS: Based on allocation analysis, all three drugs were associated with a reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the initial phase (weeks 0-6). Amisulpride and olanzapine were associated with improved insight over and above what was related to the reduction in total psychosis symptoms in the long-term phase (weeks 6-52). However, these differential effects were lost when only including the participants that chose the first drug in the randomisation sequence. We found no differential effect on insight among those who were antipsychotic-naïve and those who were previously medicated with antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that antipsychotic treatment improves insight, but whether the effect on insight surpasses the effect of reduced total psychosis symptoms is more uncertain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01446328, 05.10.2011.

Amisulpride as a potential disease-modifying drug in the treatment of tauopathies.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperphosphorylation and aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau cause the development of tauopathies, such as Alzheimer's disease and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). We recently uncovered a causal link between constitutive serotonin receptor 7 (5-HT7R) activity and pathological tau aggregation. Here, we evaluated 5-HT7R inverse agonists as novel drugs in the treatment of tauopathies. METHODS: Based on structural homology, we screened multiple approved drugs for their inverse agonism toward 5-HT7R. Therapeutic potential was validated using biochemical, pharmacological, microscopic, and behavioral approaches in different cellular models including tau aggregation cell line HEK293 tau bimolecular fluorescence complementation, primary mouse neurons, and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons carrying an FTD-associated tau mutation as well as in two mouse models of tauopathy. RESULTS: Antipsychotic drug amisulpride is a potent 5-HT7R inverse agonist. Amisulpride ameliorated tau hyperphosphorylation and aggregation in vitro. It further reduced tau pathology and abrogated memory impairment in mice. DISCUSSION: Amisulpride may be a disease-modifying drug for tauopathies.

Generalizability of the Results of Efficacy Trials in First-Episode Schizophrenia: Comparing Outcome and Study Discontinuation of Groups of Participants in the Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe (OPTiMiSE) Trial.

Objective: In the majority of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in schizophrenia populations, patients suffering from a substance use disorder (SUD) or suicidality are excluded. Excluding these patients from RCTs might impact the generalizability of results. The aim of this study is to determine whether excluding patients with suicidality and/or SUD impacts RCT results on symptomatic remission, premature study discontinuation, symptom severity, and social functioning.Methods: Across Europe and Israel, 481 patients with first-episode schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, or schizoaffective disorder, based on DSM-IV criteria, were recruited between May 26, 2011, and May 15, 2016, for the Optimization of Treatment and Management of Schizophrenia in Europe (OPTiMiSE) trial. Baseline characteristics and follow-up assessments were compared between patients with versus without baseline SUD and/or suicidality.Results: A total of 446 patients met eligibility criteria for the OPTiMiSE trial and initiated amisulpride treatment, of whom 404 (91%) had data available on suicidality, SUD, duration of illness, and CDS score. Of the 360 eligible patients with baseline data on suicidality and SUD, 106 patients had comorbid suicidality and/or SUD while 254 patients had neither of these comorbidities. No significant differences in the likelihood to achieve symptomatic remission or to prematurely discontinue the study were found when comparing comorbid versus non-comorbid patients (P = .27). There were no significant differences in symptom severity and social functioning between the groups. Comorbid patients had a higher level of depressive symptoms and more impaired social functioning compared to non-comorbid patients.Discussion: Excluding first-episode schizophrenia patients with comorbidities from clinical trials unlikely affects key outcome measures. It is recommended to include patients with comorbidities in clinical trials while carefully monitoring suicidality and implementing safety plans to gain insight into efficacy and safety of treatment in this substantial patient population.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01248195.

Age, Sex, and Comedication Effects on the Steady-State Plasma Concentrations of Amisulpride in Chinese Patients with Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Amisulpride, a second-generation atypical antipsychotic drug, was first marketed in Europe in the 1990s. This study aimed to provide a reference for the clinical application of amisulpride. The effects of age, sex, or specific comedications on amisulpride concentrations in Chinese patients with schizophrenia in the real world were investigated. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of data on amisulpride based on the therapeutic drug monitoring service database at the Zigong Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. RESULTS: Based on the inclusion criteria, 195 plasma samples from 173 patients (67.05% female and 32.95% male patients) were included for in-depth analysis. The median daily dose of amisulpride was 400 mg/d, median plasma concentration was 457.50 ng/mL, and median concentration/dose (C/D) ratio was 1.04 ng/mL/mg/d. The daily dose of amisulpride positively correlated with measured steady-state plasma concentrations. A significant difference was observed in the subgroup analysis of the combination with valproic acid, zopiclone, or aripiprazole on plasma concentrations. Combining amisulpride with these drugs increased the C/D ratios by 0.56-, 2.31-, and 0.77-fold, respectively. After adjusting for age, the median C/D ratio was found to be significantly different between female and male patients. However, no significant differences in daily dose, plasma concentration, and C/D ratio were noted with respect to sex and age of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Sex differences were inferred for the first time in this study, with differential effects on daily dose, steady-state plasma concentration, and C/D ratio associated with the population. In the included study samples, blood concentrations were distributed in the range of 223.25-823.55 ng/mL, which perhaps needs to be evaluated in line with the reference range of ammonia-sulfur ratios in the Chinese population.

Relapse in patients with schizophrenia and amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia or olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance after switching to other antipsychotics.

Hyperprolactinemia and metabolic disturbance are common side effects of antipsychotics that cause intolerance. Despite its potential influence on relapse, there are no established guidelines for antipsychotic switching. This naturalistic study explored the association between antipsychotic switching, baseline clinical status, metabolic changes, and relapse in patients with schizophrenia. In total, 177 patients with amisulpride-induced hyperprolactinemia and 274 with olanzapine-induced metabolic disturbance were enrolled. Relapse was determined by assessing changes in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total scores from baseline to 6 months (increased over 20% or 10% reaching 70). Metabolic indices were measured at baseline and 3 months. Patients with baseline PANSS >60 were more likely to relapse. Further, patients switching to aripiprazole had a higher risk of relapse regardless of their original medication. Participants who originally used amisulpride had reduced prolactin levels following medication change, while switching to olanzapine caused increased weight and blood glucose levels. In patients originally using olanzapine, only switching to aripiprazole reduced insulin resistance. Adverse effects on weight and lipid metabolism were observed in patients who switched to risperidone, while amisulpride improved lipid profiles. Changing schizophrenia treatment requires careful consideration of multiple variables, particularly the choice of substituted drug and the patient's baseline symptoms.

Efficacy and safety/tolerability of antipsychotics in the treatment of adult patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotics are widely used in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), but there has been no comprehensive meta-analytic assessment that examined their use as monotherapy and adjunctive therapy. METHODS: A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted on randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) that reported on the efficacy and safety/tolerability of antipsychotics for the treatment of adults with MDD. Data of both monotherapy and adjunctive antipsychotic use were extracted, but analyzed separately using a random-effects model. Co-primary outcomes were study-defined-treatment response and intolerability-related discontinuation. We also illustrated the risk/benefit balance of antipsychotics for MDD, using two-dimensional graphs representing the primary efficacy and safety/tolerability outcome. Secondary outcomes included psychopathology, remission, all-cause-discontinuation, inefficacy-related discontinuation, and adverse events. RESULTS: Forty-five RCTs with 12 724 patients were included in the analysis. In monotherapy (studies = 13, n = 4375), amisulpride [1.99 (1.55-2.55)], sulpiride [1.50 (1.03-2.17)], and quetiapine [1.48 (1.23-1.78)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, intolerability-related discontinuations were significantly higher compared to placebo with amisulpride and quetiapine. In adjunctive therapy (studies = 32, n = 8349), ziprasidone [1.80 (1.07-3.04)], risperidone [1.59 (1.19-2.14)], aripiprazole [1.54 (1.35-1.76)], brexpiprazole [1.41 (1.21-1.66)], cariprazine [1.27 (1.07-1.52)], and quetiapine [1.23 (1.08-1.41)] were significantly superior to placebo regarding treatment response. However, of these antipsychotics that were superior to placebo, only risperidone was equivalent to placebo regarding discontinuation due to intolerability, while the other antipsychotics were inferior. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that there are significant differences regarding the risk/benefit ratio among antipsychotics for MDD, which should inform clinical care.

Update on novel antipsychotics and pharmacological strategies for treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS), the lack of response to at least two antipsychotics administered at adequate dose and duration, epitomizes in psychiatry one of the most difficult-to-treat pathologies, epidemiologically relevant (affecting one-third of schizophrenia patients) and with severe consequences for the patients in terms of overall functioning. After 50 years, only one drug is approved for TRS: clozapine. Furthermore, a few patients do not respond even to clozapine and are indicated as clozapine-resistant patients. AREAS COVERED: In this review and expert opinion, we have critically appraised the current literature, discussing the role of old and new agents in treating resistant schizophrenia. EXPERT OPINION: The search for therapy against TRS, beyond clozapine or in addition to clozapine, has emerged over time, capturing mainly three types of strategies: 1. Add-on of a second-generation antipsychotic (i.e. amisulpride); 2. Add-on of a second antipsychotic with significantly different receptor profile compared to the older ones (e.g. aripiprazole and cariprazine); 3. Novel strategies beyond dopamine D2/D3 receptor occupancy (e.g. xanomeline + trospium, TAAR1-agonists, sodium benzoate, and D-amino acids). More high-quality clinical trials applying the current operationalized criteria for TRS and clozapine-resistance are required to evaluate the efficacy of alternative and add-on treatments.

Amisulpride augmentation therapy improves cognitive performance and psychopathology in clozapine-resistant treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Although clozapine is an effective option for treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS), there are still 1/3 to 1/2 of TRS patients who do not respond to clozapine. The main purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was to explore the amisulpride augmentation efficacy on the psychopathological symptoms and cognitive function of clozapine-resistant treatment-refractory schizophrenia (CTRS) patients. METHODS: A total of 80 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to receive initial clozapine plus amisulpride (amisulpride group) or clozapine plus placebo (placebo group). Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale scores, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale (TESS), laboratory measurements, and electrocardiograms (ECG) were performed at baseline, at week 6, and week 12. RESULTS: Compared with the placebo group, amisulpride group had a lower PANSS total score, positive subscore, and general psychopathology subscore at week 6 and week 12 (PBonferroni < 0.01). Furthermore, compared with the placebo group, the amisulpride group showed an improved RBANS language score at week 12 (PBonferroni < 0.001). Amisulpride group had a higher treatment response rate (P = 0.04), lower scores of CGI severity and CGI efficacy at week 6 and week 12 than placebo group (PBonferroni < 0.05). There were no differences between the groups in body mass index (BMI), corrected QT (QTc) intervals, and laboratory measurements. This study demonstrates that amisulpride augmentation therapy can safely improve the psychiatric symptoms and cognitive performance of CTRS patients. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that amisulpride augmentation therapy has important clinical significance for treating CTRS to improve clinical symptoms and cognitive function with tolerability and safety. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier- NCT03652974. Registered August 31, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03652974.

Changing the Antipsychotic in Early Nonimprovers to Amisulpride or Olanzapine: Randomized, Double-Blind Trial in Patients With Schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Meta-analyses have shown that the majority of patients with schizophrenia who have not improved after 2 weeks of treatment with an antipsychotic drug are unlikely to fully respond later. We hypothesized that switching to another antipsychotic with a different receptor binding profile is an effective strategy in such a situation. STUDY DESIGN: In total, 327 inpatients with an acute exacerbation of schizophrenia were randomized to double-blind treatment with either olanzapine (5-20 mg/day) or amisulpride (200-800 mg/day). Those patients who had not reached at least 25% Positive-and-Negative-Syndrome-Scale (PANSS) total score reduction from baseline after 2 weeks (the "non-improvers") were rerandomized double-blind to either staying on the same compound ("stayers") or to switching to the other antipsychotic ("switchers") for another 6 weeks. The primary outcome was the difference in the number of patients in symptomatic remission between the combined "switchers" and the "stayers" after 8 weeks of treatment, analyzed by logistic regression. STUDY RESULTS: A total of 142 nonimprovers were rerandomized at week two. 25 (45.5 %) of the 'stayers' compared to 41 (68.3 %) of the "switchers" reached remission at endpoint (p = .006). Differences in secondary efficacy outcomes were not significant, except for the PANSS negative subscore and the Clinical-Global-Impression-Scale. "Switchers" and "stayers" did not differ in safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Switching "non-improvers" from amisulpride to olanzapine or vice-versa increased remission rates and was safe. The superiority in the primary outcome was, however, not paralleled by significant differences in most secondary efficacy outcomes and the effect was only apparent at the last visit making replications of longer duration necessary.

Impact of childhood trauma on antipsychotic effectiveness in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: A prospective, pragmatic, semi-randomized trial.

Antipsychotic medications are generally effective in ameliorating psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs). Identifying predictors associated with poor treatment response is important for a personalized treatment approach. Childhood trauma (CT) may have a general and differential effect on the effectiveness of different types of antipsychotics in SSDs. The Bergen-Stavanger-Trondheim-Innsbruck (BeSt InTro) study is a pragmatic, researcher-initiated, semi-randomized trial. The present study aimed to investigate symptom change (the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) from baseline to 1, 3, 6, 12, 26, 39 and 52 weeks of antipsychotic treatment (amisulpride, aripiprazole and olanzapine) by group (CT/no CT). Participants (n = 98) with diagnoses within the schizophrenia spectrum (F20-29 in the International Classification of Diseases - 10th Revision) were randomized to receive amisulpride, aripiprazole or olanzapine, and for this study categorized into groups of none and low CT, and moderate to severe CT according to thresholds defined by the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire Short-Form manual. CT in SSDs predicted an overall slower treatment response and less antipsychotic effectiveness after 26 weeks of treatment, which was statistically nonsignificant at 52 weeks. Secondary analyses showed a differential effect of CT related to type of antipsychotic medication: patients with SSDs and CT who received olanzapine showed less antipsychotic effectiveness throughout 52 weeks of treatment. The intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were convergent. Our findings indicate that in patients with SSD and CT, delayed response to antipsychotics could be expected, and a longer evaluation period before considering change of medication may be recommended.

Pharmacological strategies for sexual recovery in men undergoing antipsychotic treatment.

INTRODUCTION: First- and second-generation antipsychotics are highly accountable for causing a plethora of medical side effects, ranging from metabolic imbalances to sexual dysfunction (SD), that frequently undermine patient-doctor relationships. Nevertheless, to date antipsychotics are one of the best treatment options for dealing with numerous either acute or chronic conditions like agitation, suicidality, depression, dementia, and of course psychosis. For these reasons, clinicians need to handle them wisely to preserve patients' sexual health, avoid poor therapeutic adherence and prevent high rates of therapy drop-out. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews the literature on pharmacologic approaches for management strategies in men who are administered with antipsychotics and developed SD. The etiology of antipsychotic-induced SD is also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Clinicians must consider sexual life as a major health domain. To do so, a first step would be to measure and monitor sexual function by means of psychometric tools. Secondly, primary prevention should be conducted when choosing antipsychotics, i.e. picking sex-sparing compounds like aripiprazole or brexpiprazole. Thirdly, if sexolytic compounds cannot be dismissed, such as first-generation antipsychotics, risperidone, paliperidone, or amisulpride, then aripiprazole 5-20 mg/day adjunctive therapy has proven to be most effective in normalizing prolactin levels and consequently treating antipsychotic-induced SD.

New Drugs 2021, Part 2.

ABSTRACT: The second of a two-part series, this article describes eight recently approved drugs, including the first drug approved for the treatment of SARS-CoV-2, a first-in-class HIV attachment inhibitor, and a new intravenous injection indicated for the treatment of acute pain in adults for whom other treatments are ineffective.

Study on the relationship among dose, concentration and clinical response in Chinese schizophrenic patients treated with Amisulpride.

OBJECTIVE: To provide therapeutic window of amisulpride dose and serum concentration. METHODS: 194 schizophrenics were assessed with PANSS. The concentration of Amisulpride in blood was tested. And relationship with concentration was analyzed. RESULTS: The dose of amisulpride was 100mg∼1200 mg/d(555+/-218), plasma concentration was 20∼1280 ng/mL(349+/-223) and C/D ratio was 0.07∼1.65 (0.63+/-0.34). The correlation of dose and concentration was significantly correlated (r = 0.55; P < 0.05).It was found that concentration(P < 0.001), C/D ratio(r = 0.383, P < 0.001), rather than dose (-0.042,p > 0.05) related to age significantly.It was found no differences in dose(p > 0.05), concentration (p > 0.05) and C/D ratio(p > 0.05) between male and female patients. The change ratio of positive symptom was 10 %∼90 %, negative symptom was 5∼80 %, general symptoms was 5∼90 %, PANSS was 5∼90 %.The correlation between change ratio of positive symptom, general symptom and PANSS and dose, concentration were significant(P < 0.01), but not related with the change ratio of negative symptom(p>0.05).The both dose and concentration of amisulpride were higher significantly in effective group than that in ineffective group according to change ratio of positive symptom, negative symptom, general symptom and PANSS(P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The correlation of dose and concentration of amisulpride was significantly correlated. The recommended range 457∼637 ng/mL was suggested as average therapeutic window.

Discovery of Nonracemic Amisulpride to Maximize Benefit/Risk of 5-HT7 and D2 Receptor Antagonism for the Treatment of Mood Disorders.

In contrast to the dose-occupancy relationship in the treatment of schizophrenia, the minimal effective level of dopamine receptor 2 (D2R) blockade for antipsychotics in the treatment of bipolar depression is unknown. Lower doses aimed at reducing extrapyramidal side effects must be balanced against the need to retain the therapeutic benefit of D2R blockade on emergent cycling, mixed, manic, anxiety, and/or psychotic symptoms. Dose-reductions intended to lower D2R blockade, however, could also decrease concomitant serotonin receptor antagonism and its potential benefit on depressive symptoms. Here, we uncoupled the potential antidepressant activity in amisulpride, driven by 5-HT7 receptor (5-HT7R) antagonism, from the D2R-mediated antipsychotic activity by discovering that each enantiomer favors a different receptor. Aramisulpride was more potent at 5-HT7R relative to esamisulpride (Ki 47 vs. 1,900 nM, respectively), whereas esamisulpride was more potent at D2R (4.0 vs. 140 nM). We hypothesized that a nonracemic ratio might achieve greater 5-HT7R-mediated antidepressant effects at a lower level of D2R blockade. The dose-occupancy relationship of esamisulpride at D2R was determined by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in human volunteers. Separately the dose-relationship of aramisulpride was established in humans using suppression of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep as a marker of 5-HT7R antagonism. These results led to the discovery of an 85:15 ratio of aramisulpride to esamisulpride (SEP-4199) that maximizes the potential for antidepressant benefit of aramisulpride via 5-HT7R and reduces esamisulpride to minimize D2R-related extrapyramidal side effects while still retaining D2R-mediated effects predicted to provide benefit in bipolar depression. The antidepressant efficacy of SEP-4199 was recently confirmed in a proof-of-concept trial for the treatment of bipolar depression (NCT03543410).

Amisulpride: A Review in Post-Operative Nausea and Vomiting.

Amisulpride intravenous (IV) injection (Barhemsys®; hereafter referred to as IV amisulpride), a selective dopamine receptor antagonist, is approved in the USA as a single IV infusion for the prevention and treatment of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in adults. Results from placebo-controlled phase III trials showed that IV amisulpride is efficacious both in the prevention of PONV (used either alone or in combination with an antiemetic of a different class) and in the treatment of PONV (irrespective of prior antiemetic prophylaxis status). When administered as a single IV infusion, amisulpride had a tolerability profile that was generally similar to that of placebo, with no significant safety concerns identified. Thus, IV amisulpride is a useful additional option in the prevention and treatment of PONV in adults, particularly for patients who have failed previous antiemetic prophylaxis and for whom effective treatment options may be limited.

Prediction of Self-Report Cognitive Function for the Symptomatic Remission in Schizophrenia Treated with Amisulpride: a Multicenter, 8-Week Case-Control Study.

This study aimed to determine whether self-report cognitive function is a predictor of symptomatic remission in amisulpride-treated schizophrenia. Patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia diagnoses who received amisulpride treatment, were recruited. Each patient received amisulpride with a flexible-dose strategy of 400-800 mg daily for eight weeks. Remission was defined by a shorter version of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scale(PANSS)criteria, which includes six items (PANSS-6) with scores of less than three in each item(criteria A) or total six scores of less than fourteen(criteria B). Three hundred and three patients completed the study in 15 hospitals in China. By criteria A, 244 (80.5%) achieved symptomatic remission at endpoint, and 258 (85.1%) by criteria B. Duration of illness (DOI) (criteria A: t = 2.31, P = 0.025,criteria B:t = 2.24,p = 0.026) and perceived deficits questionnaire at baseline (PDQ20 Day0) (criteria A: t = 3.32, P = 0.001,criteria B:t = 2.76,p = 0.006) in remission groups were less than that in non-remission groups. Logistic regression analysis took into account sex, age, age-onset, DOI, and PDQ20(Day0), and showed that PDQ20(Day0) was a predictor for symptomatic remission in criteria A (B = - 0.02, P = 0.014) and criteria B (B = - 0.03, P = 0.005). The odds ratio (OR) of achieving remission will be reduced by 2% in criteria A and 3% in criteria B. There were no significant differences in gender composition, age, BMI, education level, age-onset, a daily dose of amisulpride and the percentage of PDQ20 Improvement between remission and nonremission in criteria A or criteria B. Receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves were found for PDQ20(Day0) to define the precise scores to predict remission of schizophrenia (criteria A:AUC = 0.614, S.E. = 0.041, 95% CI = 0.535-0.694, p = 0.007; criteria B:AUC = 0.633, S.E. = 0.045, 95% CI = 0.545-0.721, p = 0.005). Our data suggest that an early self-report cognitive function in amisulpride-treated schizophrenia is important in predicting for symptomatic remission, the fewer scores of PDQ20 at baseline mean the patients have less daily cognitive difficulty, the more likely the patient is to achieve symptomatic remission.